To be clear:
Just because something is not officially supported, doesn't mean it's a 'lawless' zone. It means it's handled on a per-case basis, and should be AVOIDED because it's MUCH EASIER to get scammed from unofficial "player-to-player" agreements, that are only backed up by players themselves, rather than automated systems.
If I deem someone to do something dishonest, such as mislead someone into thinking a trade is temporary, then not honor it, I will most likely enforce a tradeback. I've done it plenty of times, and if pringles did not in fact have mystery's permission to gamble away his item, then the fault lies with pringles/sardine for the entire chain of events. Thus the safest bet is probably to nullify the entire 50/50 as the original 'player to player' agreement wasn't valid to begin with as pringles did not have full ownership over one of the items in the agreement. But it may be too late to reverse it. That said, that doesn't excuse the blatant 'scam' from mystery and punishments will be handed out as needed, once decided.
I highly advise players to not do any item 50/50s until I officially make a system for it when I can.
I'll update with the situation/final decision when I can.
Just because something is not officially supported, doesn't mean it's a 'lawless' zone. It means it's handled on a per-case basis, and should be AVOIDED because it's MUCH EASIER to get scammed from unofficial "player-to-player" agreements, that are only backed up by players themselves, rather than automated systems.
If I deem someone to do something dishonest, such as mislead someone into thinking a trade is temporary, then not honor it, I will most likely enforce a tradeback. I've done it plenty of times, and if pringles did not in fact have mystery's permission to gamble away his item, then the fault lies with pringles/sardine for the entire chain of events. Thus the safest bet is probably to nullify the entire 50/50 as the original 'player to player' agreement wasn't valid to begin with as pringles did not have full ownership over one of the items in the agreement. But it may be too late to reverse it. That said, that doesn't excuse the blatant 'scam' from mystery and punishments will be handed out as needed, once decided.
I highly advise players to not do any item 50/50s until I officially make a system for it when I can.
I'll update with the situation/final decision when I can.
x2
x3
x1
x1