10-02-2018, 08:15 PM
(10-02-2018, 05:51 PM)Brassx Wrote: More DPS = faster time to kill on average. I'm not sure where you got your math for the firerate. But it's wrong.FORGIVE ME FOR TRYING TO GET THE FIRERATE ON MY OWN :''(
Base Firerate of Mini-uzi: 0.075. Body shot damage = 14.
Base Firerate of MAC-10:0.065, Body shot damage = 12.
UZI: 8 (shots to deal 100 damage) x 0.075 = 0.6 (Actually deals 114 damage)
MAC:9 (shot to deal 100 damage) x 0.065 = 0.585. (Actually deals 108 damage)
I TRIED DAMN IT :'''(
(10-02-2018, 05:51 PM)Brassx Wrote: 125hp / 14 body shot damage = 9 shots to kill with the UZI.
125hp / 12 body shot damage = 11 shots to kill.
So that means the UZI is now better..
10 x 0.075 = 0.675
11 x 0.065 = 0.715
Yes, but who has 125 Vitality? it is more fair to do 120, since that is the average.
120hp / 14 = 9 Bodyshot
120hp / 12 = 10 Bodyshot
Mini 9*0.075=0.68
Mac 10*0.065=0.65
Anything more then the average vitality crystal, the Mini-Uzi will do slightly better.
Body Armor
14*.67=9.38=11 Bodyshots
12*.67=8.04=13 Bodyshots
11*.075=.83
13*.065=.85
Anything with bodyarmor or over average vitality, the Mini-Uzi is slightly better at body.
While the Mac10 is 100% dominate with headshot and can't be compared with the Mini-Uzi.
Does +2 bodyshot and 5% mobility compare to +6 headshot, larger clip, slightly faster firerate, and monstrous 200% deploy speed?
P.S. What is the reload speed of both. I'm sure I was wrong too.
x1