The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable - Line: 861 - File: showthread.php PHP 7.3.33 (Linux)
File Line Function
/showthread.php 861 errorHandler->error



 
Hi there Guest,  
Sign in here: Login through Steam



  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
New rules discussions(v3?)

#1
I was thinking about how much you can get away with as a Traitor, and because of that a lot of T weapons are simply not utilized (Flaregun, decoy, etc).


I think we need a massive refactoring of some of our core rules (Kos off locations, sound, and other info).

Some rules I was thinking of refactoring/expanding upon is the Traitor baiting rule, and changing it into a "Committing Traitorous act = kosable" rule, as follows:
  • Committing traitorous acts makes you kosable (Obvious right?)
    Traitorous acts could include(but not limited to):
    • Walking through/BLATANTLY avoiding bear traps.
    • Blatantly fleeing the scene of an UNID'd body, or ignoring unid'd bodies. For instance, if someone is fleeing a room and you see a body in there, but saw no call outs between the two, you should be safe to kill said person. It's on them for not calling out the other person if they happened to be Innocent. If they did call it out and you missed it and kill them, you could take a slay. (Decided at staff discretion if reported)
    • Shooting at or near someone. This does Not include OBVIOUSLY shooting at a wall or consensual testing of weapons by shooting in legs.
    • Exploding explosive barrels near someone.
    • Planting C4 or remote bombs.
    • Having T weapons without calling our you have one from a dead traitor. Even using one from a dead traitor is a risk you have to take as an innocent.
    • Damaging or killing others, UNLESS for self-defense. However, it's a little hard to prove if self defense. Any thoughts?


Another thing is logical rules:
  • Reasonable* logic should be allowed, that is, figuring out who a T is without directly seeing the actions they comitted. To be decided on a per-case basis. This includes but is not limited to:
    • Using information on bodies or other situations(to be expanded on later) to form a conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt, that a person is a T.

      This is hard to pinpoint as it can be very situational and vary VASTLY depending on the situation and context, but for example, if you ID a body and it shows they died only a few seconds ago, but you saw someone fleeing the scene with the same weapon(with no other ways to escape), just before you found/saw the body. You should be able to piece together and rightfully KOS the person fleeing the scene. But be prepared to take punishment if wrong.

      Or if it says who they are last with, with 0 call outs of any kind, and you saw the same person fleeing the scene. That should be allowed, do any of you agree?
    • Hearing a battle right around a corner or inside a room next to you, upon entering the room and seeing dead bodies with no call outs, you should be able to assume the person left standing is a T, and have no need to give any warning before killing them. Simply because there were no call outs, that's their fault if they were innocent, and could fall under "confusion caused by T" in the end. (Kill from the grave!)

      If you are reported for killing someone and you were correct, you must state very clearly in the report response - your entire logical process. Any holes in your story could/would most likely lead to you being slain. But if its a plausible explanation and the logs add up reasonably to what you've said, the report should most likely be settled with no slay.
    • More to be added as we discuss.
*Reasonable logic to be determined on a per-case basis based on the discretion of the staff online

What do you guys think so far? There's a lot more work that will need to be done, but this could be a start and I'm interested in seeing if you guys agree with what I've stated above, or what you would change. TTT is supposed to be a mystery solving game, and that fun vanishes when you can't even use information to piece things together, and instead, have to wait until you're being directly shot at or 1st hand witness someone killing someone else, not to mention it makes it way more 'run in gun hold M1' for T's, since they can get away without needing to hide bodies, burn them, or ANY of that. All the info but DNA is useless on bodies with the rules as they are now.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
New rules discussions(v3?) - Brassx - 01-23-2019, 06:42 AM
RE: New rules discussions(v3?) - Terran - 01-23-2019, 09:39 AM
RE: New rules discussions(v3?) - Unpoke - 01-23-2019, 03:57 PM
RE: New rules discussions(v3?) - Brassx - 01-23-2019, 04:21 PM
RE: New rules discussions(v3?) - Kuro - 01-23-2019, 05:07 PM
RE: New rules discussions(v3?) - Brassx - 01-23-2019, 05:15 PM
RE: New rules discussions(v3?) - Kuro - 01-24-2019, 01:48 AM
RE: New rules discussions(v3?) - Dreadark - 01-24-2019, 02:27 AM
RE: New rules discussions(v3?) - Terran - 01-23-2019, 08:07 PM
RE: New rules discussions(v3?) - Dreadark - 01-24-2019, 12:40 AM
RE: New rules discussions(v3?) - wind - 01-25-2019, 05:16 PM
RE: New rules discussions(v3?) - Catbug - 02-20-2019, 06:28 AM
RE: New rules discussions(v3?) - Terran - 02-20-2019, 07:02 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
5 Guest(s)