07-01-2017, 06:02 PM
(07-01-2017, 04:32 PM)Kuro Wrote: Do you still think this process is a good idea?
I like the whole idea of a community suggested crate with a lot things that are sought after by the community and cool ideas in general.
I feel like what turned out happening though was a lot of good or somewhat decent ideas that would have been perfect as a lower tier ended up going to waste. Instead of those items we got items that should not have been in the community crate (the average tier for example). I do like the process though even if it could use a bit more work.
Would you like to see a continuation of this series? (as in community crate 2, etc)
Absolutely, it's one of my favorite crates right now and I would love to see a second one
Do you have any suggestions on how the submission/upvote process could be better?
I don't like that you could see how many people voted on your suggestion, it should remain a secret until the end to avoid people rigging their own. I also would like to see a way to (anonymously?) comment on the suggestion and see what everyone thinks of it and take that feedback into mind too when winners are chosen.
Are you pleased with the way the CC1 turned out?
Overall I'm very pleased with it, there are a ton of good ideas and fun stuff in the crate. I'd like to see more community input on stuff being added rather than one persons idea though.
I really like what Kuro said, so im just going to ditto it.
However, me spending a total of ~850k for no godlike was kind've a bummer, as it would be for anyone.
But that bias aside, i really liked the crate in its entirety (keeping in mine what Kuro said), and it most definitely worked as a coin sink, seeing as how after so many crates were rolled only two godlike dropped (sadly, both being the cerberus).
When a dragon round begins.
