07-01-2017, 06:44 AM
- Do you still think this process is a good idea?
- Would you like to see a continuation of this series? (as in community crate 2, etc)
- Do you have any suggestions on how the submission/upvote process could be better?
The upvote thing isn't really great. Maybe disable public visibility to not show what to leech vote off of. Any suggestions that were nearing the final week never had any chance since barely anyone voted on the new ones.
I didn't know how good the stats were without going to the server and finding a weapon that had identical stats to test. Also, I would be very confused on how much stats I should give everything. Most legendaries have negative and positives, but then things like scaredy bunny and spring duck have all positives. Whats stopping me from making a really good gun all around and then making a single negative stat.
I remember there were a few stats missing.
I am a person who did this, but I would ignore suggestions because they seemed exactly the same. I read many zombie related ones.
Add crystals to the selection.
Maybe a separate place to create/vote on global weapon traits.
- Are you pleased with the way the CC1 turned out?
If this continues, think about fancy, the man who opened 800K coins and got 5 primordials, but no godlikes. RNG will be RNG.
The people saying that the weapons were uncreative have to think about this with coding. If it's too complex, all of them can be complex. That means all new players have to remember what godlike-like unlikely does, which there were a good number of unlikely.