05-13-2017, 07:08 AM
There's two aspects to this and that's rulewise what's legal/just and gamewise what is legal/just
[Traitorous Action]Fancy(Innocent) carries unIDed body, refuses to ID
Gamewise he can be killed as he is being traitorous
Rulewise he can be reported and slain for karma baiting
Fancy gives permission to kill him which you can implicitly do as he is being traitorous
[Traitorous Action] mintyfresh(innocent) kills Fancy(innocent)
Gamewise you can be killed as you did something traitorous
Rulewise you cannot be reported as you did the right thing
moments later
[Traitorous Action] Ziggy(innocent) kills mintyfresh(innocent)
Gamewise he can be killed for doing something traitorous
Rulewise he cannot be reported as he killed you for doing something traitorous
Logically this could repeat ad infinitum
In this case Kcat did the right thing and Fancy is the one who should have been in trouble for causing an RDM train
[Traitorous Action]Fancy(Innocent) carries unIDed body, refuses to ID
Gamewise he can be killed as he is being traitorous
Rulewise he can be reported and slain for karma baiting
Fancy gives permission to kill him which you can implicitly do as he is being traitorous
[Traitorous Action] mintyfresh(innocent) kills Fancy(innocent)
Gamewise you can be killed as you did something traitorous
Rulewise you cannot be reported as you did the right thing
moments later
[Traitorous Action] Ziggy(innocent) kills mintyfresh(innocent)
Gamewise he can be killed for doing something traitorous
Rulewise he cannot be reported as he killed you for doing something traitorous
Logically this could repeat ad infinitum
In this case Kcat did the right thing and Fancy is the one who should have been in trouble for causing an RDM train