09-09-2016, 02:03 AM
(09-09-2016, 02:01 AM)nice_the_bear Wrote:(09-09-2016, 01:38 AM)tobiasxz Wrote:(09-09-2016, 01:35 AM)nice_the_bear Wrote: so if you know for %100 that someone is a t its rdm now?
are you stupid?
he said when people say something along the lines of "x is a T, but no KOS since i have NO PROOF".
then why would they say "x is a T" if they had no proof? that'd just be blatant false kos
Because they don't have proof, they have suspicion. Is the difference between proof and suspicion really that hard to comprehend?