Do you still think this process is a good idea?
Somewhat. The current system just promotes people spamming their friends to upvote their dumb suggestions to get added(which happened with quite a few items)
Would you like to see a continuation of this series? (as in community crate 2, etc)
If there are better regulations on the next crate, then sure, otherwise I'm not too sure.
Do you have any suggestions on how the submission/upvote process could be better?
I think with the next crate, you should only be allowed to suggest stats, and not names/rarity. You should be to put down what you think the name/rarity should be, but it should not be guaranteed to be that. A lot of the current items in the crate feel way too memey and dumb, at least their names are. I.E Grandma's Cane, Glock-a-doodle-dont, etc.
I also think that next time the amount of votes an item has should remain hidden, so people don't bandwagon on a single item, and actually upvote stuff they want.
Are you pleased with the way the CC1 turned out?
I think this was a good test run of what it could be, however, as I've stated, I do believe there should be much stricter regulations next time.
Somewhat. The current system just promotes people spamming their friends to upvote their dumb suggestions to get added(which happened with quite a few items)
Would you like to see a continuation of this series? (as in community crate 2, etc)
If there are better regulations on the next crate, then sure, otherwise I'm not too sure.
Do you have any suggestions on how the submission/upvote process could be better?
I think with the next crate, you should only be allowed to suggest stats, and not names/rarity. You should be to put down what you think the name/rarity should be, but it should not be guaranteed to be that. A lot of the current items in the crate feel way too memey and dumb, at least their names are. I.E Grandma's Cane, Glock-a-doodle-dont, etc.
I also think that next time the amount of votes an item has should remain hidden, so people don't bandwagon on a single item, and actually upvote stuff they want.
Are you pleased with the way the CC1 turned out?
I think this was a good test run of what it could be, however, as I've stated, I do believe there should be much stricter regulations next time.
x1