![]() |
Tier between unlikley and rare - Printable Version +- Forerunner Gaming (https://forerunnergaming.org/forums) +-- Forum: Server Discussion (https://forerunnergaming.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=19) +--- Forum: Suggestions (https://forerunnergaming.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=20) +--- Thread: Tier between unlikley and rare (/showthread.php?tid=3267) |
Tier between unlikley and rare - SilentSpy - 01-31-2016 I know it's been suggested before I just wanted to see what others had to say. I've already said that lightweights, in my opinion, need another bump (but don't fit in rare) while others, like doctorates, need a bump down but don't fit in with unlikleys. Any other suggestions, pros or cons? RE: Tier between unlikley and rare - Unpoke - 01-31-2016 i mean i guess? idk, there shouldnt be an excessive amount of tiers either maybe make room for it by bringing uncommon and ordinary together since both of them are equally worthless RE: Tier between unlikley and rare - Enchantable - 01-31-2016 Adding another tier would be a bit much like Unpoke stated I think it's fine the way it is. RE: Tier between unlikley and rare - SilentSpy - 01-31-2016 So maybe instead of adding a new tier, moving a lot of unlikleys down to uncommon? I don't want too many rarities either but the disparity between rare and unlikley is pretty large and moving things to uncommon would only make another gap. RE: Tier between unlikley and rare - HeisenBurger - 01-31-2016 Terranable for uncommon! |