+- Forerunner Gaming (https://forerunnergaming.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Server Discussion (https://forerunnergaming.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: Suggestions (https://forerunnergaming.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=20)
+--- Thread: +members get vbat (/showthread.php?tid=1822)
RE: +members get vbat - 2bias - 08-15-2015
(07-24-2015, 01:57 AM)TobiasX Wrote: I'm just gonna casually re-post this.
(07-23-2015, 12:39 PM)TobiasX-kun Wrote: in all honesty, guests should automatically have VBat on, and just add a regular/trusted rank, which removes that restriction, and does nothing more.
RE: +members get vbat - Keez⭕⃤ - 08-15-2015
(08-15-2015, 04:23 PM)TobiasX Wrote:(07-24-2015, 01:57 AM)TobiasX Wrote: I'm just gonna casually re-post this.
(07-23-2015, 12:39 PM)TobiasX-kun Wrote: in all honesty, guests should automatically have VBat on, and just add a regular/trusted rank, which removes that restriction, and does nothing more.
RE: +members get vbat - Dreadark - 08-15-2015
Tobias' idea isn't bad.
Although it would be much easier if +members just had a temporary vbat. Because it feels like +members are almost always on.
RE: +members get vbat - Chosen - 08-18-2015
I think +members should at least get a vbat command , but as well as a votegag (This would help because when there isn't a moderator on, most people are mic spamming) and if !vbat (Name) wouldn't work then what about a votevbat command instead. Just some way for there to be a cut on how much mic spam has been going on would be gratefully appreciated.
RE: +members get vbat - NeoLeo - 08-18-2015
a Vote Vbat and Vote Gag would be much help in a huge server with no mods on,
just incase normal VBat wouldnt be allowed
RE: +members get vbat - Unpoke - 08-18-2015
(08-18-2015, 10:20 PM)Leo The Sexy Kitty Wrote: a Vote Vbat and Vote Gag would be much help in a huge server with no mods on,
just incase normal VBat wouldnt be allowed
making it vote would be so pointless, 85% of the players hate vbat in general
it'd hardly ever fly.
people complain that its active even when it's desperately needed.
RE: +members get vbat - Enchantable - 08-18-2015
i do nothing in this community so
+1
RE: +members get vbat - 2bias - 08-18-2015
(08-15-2015, 04:29 PM)Dubstepcat Wrote:(08-15-2015, 04:23 PM)TobiasX Wrote:(07-24-2015, 01:57 AM)TobiasX Wrote: I'm just gonna casually re-post this.
(07-23-2015, 12:39 PM)TobiasX-kun Wrote: in all honesty, guests should automatically have VBat on, and just add a regular/trusted rank, which removes that restriction, and does nothing more.
RE: +members get vbat - Chosen - 08-18-2015
(08-18-2015, 10:23 PM)Unpoke Wrote: making it vote would be so pointless, 85% of the players hate vbat in general
it'd hardly ever fly.
people complain that its active even when it's desperately needed.
Ever actually done a vote when people are mic spamming? Most the server would vote Yes for a mass vbat, so I doubt they'd vote No for singular or mass vbat.
RE: +members get vbat - Unpoke - 08-18-2015
(08-18-2015, 10:59 PM)NotChosen Wrote:(08-18-2015, 10:23 PM)Unpoke Wrote: making it vote would be so pointless, 85% of the players hate vbat in general
it'd hardly ever fly.
people complain that its active even when it's desperately needed.
Ever actually done a vote when people are mic spamming? Most the server would vote Yes for a mass vbat, so I doubt they'd vote No for singular or mass vbat.
I don't know if I agree with that...
Either way, a serverwide vote just to vbat someone seems a little redundant, don't ya think?
I'unno, maybe there could be another way. Voting between just +Members and above? If there's only one +Member or above there just let it fly?
hoo noes